Monday, December 2, 2013

Your Bi-Annual Post-Race Tradition

a race report

I ran a half-marathon this weekend; it's turned into something of a tradition. Two a year, at least for the past 3 years. This was a new one, the Quarry Lakes Turkey Half Marathon here in Fremont, organized by Brazen Racing. I'm going to try to keep this short, of course, I say that every time.


This was a bittersweet race for me. Okay, you can 86 the sweet, sub extra bitter. We had originally decided to do this race as an event with our church youth group. We, as leaders, would run and encourage the students to join in with us. It's a great lesson for young people; you commit to a difficult task, prepare for it, and then complete it. The accomplishment you feel is genuine, and that's basically what you do every day in real life. In the spirit of camaraderie, I also invited several other friends to join in with me, and many declared that they would run as well.

Every single one of them dropped out, bailed out, or quit. And when race day finally came along, no one in the youth group, no one from church, and none of my friends even bothered to come by and support me and cheer along the course or at the start or finish line.

It was a very lonely race.

There was a cool moment, about a quarter-mile from the finish that a group of teenagers (who I think had already finished the race) were standing by the course. As I came around the corner, they all started whooping and cheering "Nathan! Go Nathan! You're almost there! Great job!" That I was glad for.

It was also wonderful to run into my old friend Jared at the starting line, and at the finish line. We were able to catch up a little bit after the race; I need to go running with that guy more often.

As for the race itself, it was so-so. I didn't run well, which I attribute to two main factors:
  1. My training wasn't sufficient. I started over a month late (due to a century bicycle ride I did), and then I was beset by minor injuries and setbacks which reduced the number of training runs I was able to get in.
  2. Three-quarters of the course was over gravel and rocky dirt trails. For most runners, not a big deal. For me with my super-thin Vibram Five Finger shoes, it meant shooting pain through my foot every time I stepped on a rock or uneven surface (which was nearly every step). In addition to the pain, my pace slowed down while I was stared down the path looking for the best spots to land without pain. This stopped me from being able to get into a zone, and was mentally exhausting as well.
I ran a 2:02:07, which is not a great time for me. According to the MapMyRun record of the race, my final distance was actually 13.58 miles (a half marathon course is 13.1). My pace with that distance was nearly identical to my last race, though still not a personal best.

Things I liked about this race:
  • It was local! I was so happy that it was so close and I didn't have to wake up super early and drive all the way out to San Francisco or San Jose or somewhere far.
  • Parking was simple and close. And free.
  • Participant size was small enough to be personal, but large enough that I was never alone on the course.
  • Very frequent aid stations.
  • The post-race food selection was superb. Pie (seriously), Its-It gourmet ice cream sandwiches, plus all of the normal fixins. And lots of it. More than enough.
  • Your race bib has your name on it, so 
  • The race announcer saluted everyone by name as the crossed the finish line.
All-in-all, I was very impressed with the race organizer, Brazen Racing. I would definitely do more races by them.

Things I didn't like about this race:
  • The course was mostly gravel paths. Already noted above.
  • At the finish line, they had water, but in coolers and paper cups. I would have liked to have had a bottle of water (or sports beverage).
Anyways, it was what it was. I sure didn't think I was ready, and I wasn't, but I haven't backed out of a race yet. I don't plan to start. At least I showed myself that even unprepared, I've still got enough mojo.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Terrible Tuesday Review Blitz Frenzy!

Let's buzz through and catch up on some stuff, eh? We'll keep it brief, 'cuz you don't read the longwinded stuff anyway. Want to know more? Comment for me, and I'll elaborate! or is it elabo-nate! Yeah, no. It's not.

an album review
Inland by Jars of Clay



The short: excellent. Get it. The third best Jars of Clay album (following the eponymous debut and Who We Are Instead), which means it's still better than the best album by most bands.

The slightly longer: Jars of Clay, in my opinion, has released three excellent albums and two good albums (The Long Fall Back Home and The Eleventh Hour), and I haven't even paid attention to Good Monsters. The only dud is If I Left the Zoo, which is, honestly, an awful awful terrible horrible very bad no good album. I'll forgive one mistake. How many other bands do i think put out five good albums? Not many. Starflyer 59, U2, Weezer, the White Stripes. Silversun Pickups are on that path, but they've only got 3 out. What does that mean, though? I'm impressed.

They evolve with each album, and they continue their recent trend of channeling the best of 80's pop music without cheesing out too much. Best tracks: Inland and Stay Awake, with lots of other good tunes.

a movie review
Every Movie with Jason Statham



Really, they're all the same movie. You always know exactly what you're going to get. And what you get is awesome.

That being said, i think Mel Gibson was better as the character Parker than Jason Statham. Payback is a highly under-rated movie.

a movie review
Blue Like Jazz



Love the book, love the author, was worried the movie would be bad because if you've read the book you know it's not easily movie-able.

Surprisingly, it's a good movie! Great, no, but good. Enjoyable. True to the spirit of the book without being heavy-handed. Could inspire some good discussions. Although the actor playing Don was trying to hard to be Toby Maguire.

A restaurant review
Sauced in Livermore, CA

All I knew was that it featured BBQ and whiskey. I like both of those things. I've been itching to try this place literally since it opened.

It was a lot more upscale than i anticipated, but I should have known that on account of it being smack dab in the middle of downtown Livermore. They had a band playing rock classics, bluegrass style. It was packed, but it was also a fundraiser night for some cancer charity or something.

The whiskey selection was huge. I ordered an Old Fashion with Maker's Mark 46. It was served in a glass jar, and it was good.

I ordered a combo with burnt ends and sliced brisket, with bbq beans and sour apple coleslaw as sides. The beans were good, the slaw was more tangy than creamy. It was fine, but I prefer either more sharp vinegar or classic creaminess. Personal preference. The BBQ itself was California good. That means if you're from California, you'd think it was great. I found it hilarious that they put a disclaimer in the menu about the smoke ring on the meat (from the smoking process). Compared to Kansas City bbq, it was average. Enjoyable, but it wasn't twice as good as Dickie's BBQ, which cost half as much.

Their sauces were good. I especially liked their spicy sauce. Unlike most places, it was actually spicy. I applaud that.

Go there for the atmosphere and the drink menu and the experience, you'll enjoy the food. If you just want california good bbq, you may as well go to Dickie's (which I do love).

My dinner company at Sauced was quality, too.

Clever name, though, right?

a weather review
California rain


it rained today. In California. we're supposed to complain about this, because it's only supposed to happen when it doesn't get me wet. But I am excited that things will finally start turning green soon.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Reflections of the Way Things Used to Be

I used to keep a blog (before anyone knew what a blog was) on early social networking sight Livejournal. It's been over 5 years since I put anything on it, but it's fascinating to look back at who I used to be. I quit writing in Livejournal about the time my life began a massive make-over, so it's quite fascinating to look back at the me-that-used-to-be (be careful, he had a lot of issues back then).

Here's an entry i wrote soon after my roommate and close friend Harold Rosas (the Gopher Boy) passed away...

I feel very much as if my apartment should be haunted, or something of the such. I mean, it's not. in fact it's a lot of quiet, and a lot bigger than it used to be, or so it seems.

There's still a fair bit of stuff to go through, most of it to be thrown away or moved or something or other. Some stuff to be dumped off at Half Price Books or rasputins. I dunno. I know what i have to do, more or less, and i even know where i probably should, but actually getting to it is somewhat more troublesome it seems.

The last time i saw Harold, he was getting out of his car. i road [sic] past him on my bike, heading home to my apartment. I was in a hurry to go meet up with everyone to see [The Simpsons Movie], but I left the door open to our apartment so he wouldn't have to shuffle his load of carry-ons to open the door. I was putting up my bike and stuff, and i kept waiting for him, and he wasn't coming. After a few minutes and finishing up my stuff, i was going back to my room to change so i closed the door. I looked out the front window to see if he was coming, but i noticed that his car was gone, he had actually been packing up to leave for wherever rather than coming home.

If i was a writer--which i guess i am--and I was writing this scene for a novel, I would have used it as foreshadowing, leaving the door open for him to come home, and him leaving instead.

Hmmm.

I guess you could say i'm handling everything ok. i mean, i don't know how you're supposed to handle things like this so i'm not exacctly sure i'm qualified to say if i'm handling it well or not. *shrug* Mostly i just think i have a lot more room than i used to.
This is one of the most surreal scenes of my entire life, so much so that I find it hard to believe it really happened like that. But it did. I left the door open, and waited, but he never came home. And that line that I finished the post with, "Mostly I just think I have a lot more room than I used to." I believe that may be one of the best, most real, lines I've ever put down on paper. It seems so simple, so blase, but it was so much how I felt at that moment. Metaphors like that aren't supposed to happen in real life.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Mad Scientists Log, Project 86

I'm going to try to cram two reviews and a forecast of future posts into this here thing-a-ma-bob.

A concert review

Project 86, Petaluma, CA, November 2, 2013 (with A Hero to Fall, Arrhythmia, and Mirrors)

 



I road-tripped up north to Petaluma with Jesse to catch the reclusive Project 86. It's been many years since we've gone out to see Project, whom we've seen multiple times at the Pound in SF but for reasons unknown have avoided the immediate Bay Area in recent years.

I'm genrally pro-Project 86, but I would hardly consider myself a die-hard fan. I love their second album, Drawing Black Lines, and I've enjoyed the other songs that I've heard, but that was like 5 albums ago. I only keep up with them in a way that's peripheral, at best.

All that said, I've seen them play live something like 3 or 4 times, and never had a poor outing.

this was no exception.

The show was in some dingy, graffiti-ridden theatre that at one time was home to legitimate art, but seems to have been relegated to poor-man punk bands of late. Exactly the sort of place you want to see a metal band play. There was no bar--prime example of an abandoned property a mega-church bought or rented for their "reach-the-youth-group-with-metal-punk-band-ministry." I'm okay with that.

The three opening bands were local North Bay/Santa Rosa metal bands, and seemed to have their followings from the youth groups they probably graduated from. All were full of talented musicians with a solid understanding of playing together and playing for a crowd. Arrhythmia, especially, seemed to have a good connection with the crowd.

I expected to think each one of them would suck, but I walked away from each one saying, "That was a lot better than I expected. Well done, kids, well done." I say kids, because all of the band members were teen/early 20-somethings, babies practically. We shouldn't forget that I'm old and remember when Michael Jackson was cool when Thriller came out.

And then Project came on, and I immediately understood the difference between the amateurs and the professionals. Project is an accomplished band, and they've been signed on major labels and done mega-tours, but at this stage in their career you can hardly say they're selling out arenas.

They played along with track music, and it was seamless, but  they were leaps and bounds ahead of the opening three bands. Their energy was more focused, and the quality of their songwriting was noticeably better. Lead singer and foundation of the band Andrew Schaub roamed the stage like a wild animal, and poured everything he had into the show (even though there were less than 100 people in the room). As his wide-eyes passed over the audience, it felt to me like he was looking directly at me, personally. Only one other singer has been able to do that--Shirley Manson from Garbage. The man is an incredible live performer, and intelligent commentator.

I had been worried I wouldn't recognize any of their songs, but they played through the "greatest hits" of their catalog, and I recognized more than enough songs to get excited, including my personal favorite "Stein's Theme."

Long story short, they rocked and I got home and immediately bought their newest album Wait for the Siren from Amazon.

Project 86 has earned my respect, and I will profess admiration for them their music, and their live performances for years go come.

a movie review

The Counselor




I wanted to see the Counselor because it was written by Cormac McCarthy, one of my favorite authors, was directed by a respected filmmaker, and stared several actors I love. Cormac McCarthy is best known for his novels, including Blood Meridian (an Evening of Redness in the West), No Country for Old Men, and The Road (the later two of which were made into quality movies; the former is considered one of the best novels written in the modern era). (Mikey Gee, that last link is to the Onion AV Club!)

The Counselor was McCarthy's first screenplay, kind of. Produced screenplay at least.

Long story short, you can skip the movie. it's not that good. it's a clear example of a novelist writing in an unfamiliar medium. He doesn't understand how to let the visual media tell the story, and ends up trying to talk to much. The characters are long-winded and talk ad naseum, trying to sound deep and profound. It certainly isn't, or doesn't come across as such. And you don't really care for (m)any of the characters.

Caveat: there is a time where this would be an excellent movie to watch. If you are studying film making, or screenwriting, you should watch this movie. it's a brilliant case study in unrestrained writing from an unskilled screenwriter. As what not to do. It's even better if you team it up with No Country for Old Men, bot the movie and the book.

Want an interesting discussion? Watch No Country for Old Men, read the novel, and then watch the Counselor. No Country for Old Men was originally conceived as a screenplay, but then completed in novel form. After the novel was written, a screenwriter made it into a movie. Both came from the mind and talent of McCarthy, who is an excellent writer. But when adapted by a writer familiar with the medium, we end up with a phenomenal movie and an excellent novel. But when McCarthy is left to write the screenplay without an editor/critiquer who has the balls to tell him it won't work, you end up with a bloated, over-winded movie that tries way to hard to be good and simply fails.

a notice of upcoming posts, in no particular order.
reviews of Alton Brown's live tour (Inevitable Edible Tour), Jars of Clay's Inland album, and my Giant Defy Composite Carbon 1 bicycle
Discussions on weight-loss topics, why Eureka may be the best show that was on TV, and why I love Edgar Rice Burroughs.

Friday, November 1, 2013

On the Contrary, Gravity is Foremost on my Mind

One can hardly begin talking about Gravity without recalling the charming scene from the beginning of Star Trek V: the Awful Star Trek With Spock's Brother (I don't think that's its official name, but it should be)...




 It may have been a terrible movie (Star Trek: the Motion Picture, worse or better than Star Trek V: the Final Frontier, ready, set, GO IN COMMENTS) but it had some wonderfully quotable moments as well.

Now that that is out of the way, we're going to talk about Gravity. You'll notice the capital "g," which means we're talking about a proper noun instead of the more generic gravity-with-a-little-g, you know, the sort of thing that trips us. So, yes, that means we're talking about the movie.

Well, I'm not actually going to talk a whole lot about the movie, but the wonderful lessons the filmmakers and TV writers and penny-dreadful, pulp writers in Hollywood and beyond should take from the movie.

So, let's get the prerequisite rating and such out of the way. If you don't know what this movie is, there's probably a rock somewhere you call your house, but I'll humor you with a brief recount: it's a scientifiction/disaster story that takes place on a space shuttle mission and stars Sandra Bullock and George Clooney (and only the two of them). Directed and written by Alfonso Cuarón (perhaps best known for the wonderful Children of Men and Y Tu Mama Tambien, one of the better films to come out of Mexico in recent years)(and Great Expectations, one of my brother & sister's favorite movies)



I loved it. Really, I did. Nearly everything about it. And this is from a self-admitted notoriously harsh critic. Probably the best movie I've seen this year, and I don't anticipate anything bumping it from that spot (yes, even a Hobbit or Book Thief).
  • I thought the actors did a wonderful job, neither under- nor over-acting. George Clooney gets by on being charming George Clooney, but really that's what we like him for. Sandra Bullock is likeable and relatable, but realistically so. She felt more like an everyday person than the hero of a big-budget summer blockbuster film. Which is good. 
  • The story was beautifully paced, building and releasing tension (and you know how much I love that) at just the right times so that you don't get too worn or burned out. But it still kept you on your seat.
  • The effects were beautiful (and one of the few movies that benefited from 3-D), and supported the story rather than distracting from it.
  • The music and sound FX wonderfully enhance without detracting from everything else.
  • The writing was crisp and, well, normal. Sandra B's lines were like normal people talked! Well, maybe not as much George Clooney, but by golly he's GEORGE CLOONEY he's charming enough he can get away with it.
  • Suspension of Disbelief was maintained completely from start to finish. Sure, there have been some nitpicks by people wanting to bitch and moan, but everything served the story, built on the themes of the movie, and did not appear implausible or distracting.
If i were to star-rate it, which I"m generally not prone to do except that people like to see that sort of thing, I would give it 4 out of 5 stars. Which is especially impressive because that's really as high of a rating as you can receive without being The Princess Bride or Back to the Future (the two perfect movies).

I actually spent more time on the movie than I intended. But now onto the other stuff, the stuff I really wanted to mention.

I hope that the producers and directors and actors and (most importantly) writers notice this movie. Why? Because it is such a wonderful example of how a small story can be powerful. You don't have to threaten the world, or blow up a city, or build the biggest robot spaceship ever to make a good story. Good stories are powerful; good stories are about people, people like you and I caught in tremendous circumstances. It's okay to focus on the tremendous people rather than the outlandish circumstances.

It's no secret that Hollywood has become enamored with style over substance lately, and maybe lately is a generous assessment. We, as a movie-going, ticket-buying demographic, shoulder our fair share of the blame for this. Every time we go to the movies, or rent from Redbox we are voting for the type of movie we want to see Hollywood produce, and those are the only votes that the motion picture studios listen to.

We're Americans, we're the richest, most affluent society that has every existed on planet Earth, and we like this big and loud and outlandish. That's okay, and there's a place for that.

It's okay to be quiet, to be close, personal. There's room to wait, to breathe.

To catch our breath. To suffocate, slowly.

In the battle of epic motion pictures, there's only so many cities and planets and populations you can blow up. The Star Trek reboot destroyed Vulcan in it's first movie! Superman and the Avengers leveled city block after city block to save the world from mass destruction in their first movies. Where else do you go? How can you keep getting bigger and bigger? There's only so many times you can threaten the fate of the (fictional) world (nobody cares about because they have no connection with it) before we don't care anymore. We've seen that special effect already.

Superman's greatest battles are not with massively over-powered supervillains, but rather the little choices he has to make every single day to do the right thing, the hard thing, when it would be so easy for him to rule over the earth with an iron fist if he chose. No one could stop him. But he chooses, every single day, to be something less than he is so that the rest of us can be something more than we are.

I applaud Iron Man 3 in this regard. It was hardly a perfect movie, but it worked very hard to stop the cycle of one-upsmanship. It didn't try to be bigger than The Avengers, or even Iron Man 2. It narrowed the focus back to the character, and let us see weakness and dealing with that weakness.

So go out, and vote with your wallets. It's okay to chose style sometimes, but try to chose substance just as often. It will strengthen all of the stories.We don't want the scales to tip too far in one direction or the other. We need that balance, because that's where we'll find the next movie like The Matrix, a beautiful blend of style and substance. But The Matrix is a post for another day.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Tension is to be loved

not a review, perhaps something substantial...

"But tension is to be loved when it is like a passing note to a beautiful, beautiful chord..."



Such are the words of Sixpence None the Richer (a highly under-rated band) in their song Tension is a Passing Note from their tremendous album "Divine Discontent." The song itself is about being in a long-distance relationship, but it touches on the fundamental truth about the structure of music* itself.

You've heard the Rufus Wainwright song (covering the substantially better Jeff Buckley version, which itself was covering the classic Leonard Cohen song) Hallelujah, most popular from the Shrek movie. They talk about it, too, "...it goes like this, the fourth, the fifth, the minor fall and the major lift."
For those of you who don't speak music, the fourth and fifth refer to the fourth and fifth notes (or chords) in a scale, and the minor and major are different chord voicings. Basic scales contain seven unique chords at their foundation, including three major, three minor, and one diminished chord. Most simplistically put, major chords sound more bright and cheerful, and minor chords sound more dark and somber. Diminished chords are the redheaded stepchildren and appear very rarely in popular song & verse.
The elements that make up a melody are--at their root, in their essence--a combination of three different dichotic relationships, on & off, loud & quiet, and consonance & dissonance.

As a musician, one of my core tenants is the idea that the notes that you do not play are just as important as the notes that you do play. This is the relationship between on & off, when you play a note and when you do not. From this relationship, we derive rhythm. It is my opinion that this is often abused in modern music, especially by lead guitarists and keyboard players who learned solo piano before joining groups and bands.

S p a c e   i s   i m p o r t a n t   i n   s e t t i n g   a n          a  t  m  o  s  p  h  e  r  e             a n d   impact

The difference between loud & quiet (known as dynamics, in music speak) is the most overtly obvious relationship, and also one of the hardest for amateur musicians to control. It's so easy to play everything loud and full. Combined with a disrespect for space in music, we (musicians) churn out cacophonic, lumbering jet engines of songs. It's a lot about ego, no-one wants to be left out or trust the other musicians to carry the moment. Nobody said musicians were overly concerned with the well-being of the whole.

The least obvious, and perhaps most important from a melodic standpoint, is dissonance. As I already mentioned, there are seven core notes in any scale, beginning with the root (first) note. This is the foundation, the basis for all comparisons in the melody. The remaining seven notes have varying degrees of conflict or harmony with the root note. The third and fifth notes are the most harmonious, and the seventh is the most conflicting (or dissonant). (In reality, there are eleven potential instead of seven, but the other four are too dissonant, and appear infrequently. We're speaking in very broad terms here, you must understand, there is a great deal of nuance and a whole lot more to it when you start digging deep) It is the relationships between these notes (or their respective chords) and the root note that drive everything we know as harmony and melody. The further you travel from the root note, in terms of dissonant notes, the greater the tension and need for a resolve (a return to the root note).

Legend has it, probably an urban legend but a good example, that Beethoven's housekeeper had trouble getting his attention when he was engrossed in his work. To draw his attention, she would play a chord progression on the piano, and end it without resolving back to the root chord. Beethoven would be so unsettled by the lack of resolve that he would come down and finish the progression.

You would know it if a song didn't end on the resolve note; it would feel incomplete and unsettling. You may think you're not a musician, or know nothing of music, but your mind and your ears are so finely tuned to the patterns of music that you would know something was wrong.

And that's the beauty of tension, the resolve. When the bass plays the seventh (dissonant) note briefly on the way back to the root, you (subconsciously) feel that tension build and release.

Without that tension, that unsettled moment, the final resolution would not be as sweet. Should the tension be derided, or scorned, or hated, or thrown out? Hardly. Tension is to be loved when it is like a passing note to a beautiful, beautiful chord. Are we still talking about music?

*at least Western music, which was largely codified and popularized by J.S. Bach in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, specifically with his group of works called The Well-Tempered Clavier. I'm not at all familiar with music traditions originating beyond the European, North, & South American traditions, and I suppose they could be based on some different ideas, specifically regarding consonance and dissonance. Probably likely that they do.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Tuesday Tue-for Review-for!

Good morning faithful readers!

Today, we are going to review two completely different entertainment media oeuvres...

a book review

And the Mountains Echoed by Khaled Hosseini

Well, since I'm mostly a stand-up guy, I'll admit, we're only reviewing this one single book, and not Hosseini's entire collection of work, on account of I haven't read any of his other works (if you understand why I used this disclaimer, pat yourself on the back and congratulate your 10th grade vocab lessons).

Once again (like some very sad lemon cake), I read this book on account of my wonderful sister-in-law (read her here, she's got a pretty good handle on this whole blog thing) and her monthly online book club. Once again, I read this book later than everyone else. That's just how I roll.

Anywhoseewhatsit, I wasn't a big fan. I suppose I should clarify, though. The reason I didn't like it wasn't at all because it was a bad book, but because it a) wasn't a genre I generally much care for, and 2) it wasn't what I expected it to be. In fact, Hosseini is an excellent writer, and if you're into his kind of stories I'd imagine you'd think very highly of this book.

I suppose I expected a more linear plot line, you know some exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolutions, but instead I discovered concentric circular stories, each one connected and a refracted version of the others. Not that there's anything wrong with that; Geoffry Chauncer got a lot of play from that style, and one of my favorite books, Hyperion by Dan Simmons, uses it as well. It just wasn't enough to overcome my prepossessions.

clearly the best and most accurate depiction of Chaucer in our era...

I've just spent a lot of time explaining why I didn't like it but making excuses that you probably will, so you might as well just go read it yourself. You can tell me what you think, in the comments below.

so, then, because we're doing a Tuesday Tue-for, a tv review

The Big Bang Theory, Season 6.

I love the Big Bang Theory, and I have for a very long time. but since I prefer to watch my television shows in compressed-time-frame batches, I usually wait for it to come out on DVD before I watch. And this is the case here.

Well, as I mentioned, I followed tBBT since the days when Penny was simply the object of desire, and not the possessed-reward. I loved the geek humor (because I'm a geek). True story, my roommate and I once had a Lord of the Rings-related argument, and then watched the same argument unfold on tBBT a week later. As the show progressed, it moved away from geek-centric joke formula to a geeks-in-a-relationship formula, which admitted, I can relate to much less. But I still enjoy it.

It was very clear to me that a great deal of the writers on the show changed out beginning in Season 5, which started off very slow before they finally hit their stride and found their comfort level with the characters.

I don't know if they changed out writers again, but the direction they went with Season 6 was clearlyy a departure from their old ways. With most of the characters in a much more stable life situation, they switched the focus from "light-hearted" to "warm-hearted." Tenderness replaced whimsical.

And they did a pretty good job of the warm fuzzies, fact. I enjoyed the season, but I prefer the whimsical. There were a number of excellent moments in the season, but taken on a whole, it was their weakest season in my opinion.

*Spoilers here follow, proceed at your own caution!*

the excellent moments
  • Penny telling Leonard she loves him
  • Amy & Sheldon discussing the intimacy of their relationship after the D&D game
  • The girls arguing about comic books (one of the funniest moments in the show, for sure)
  • The guys playing D&D (both times)
  • Raj & Stewart forming a friendship
the areas found lacking
  • every scene of Howard in space.
  • Raj & Stewart's friendship completely vanishing halfway through the season
  • Raj's alcoholism (i know it was necessary to keep him in the show, but you wrote yourself into your own hole with that gag in season 1. it took you way to long to dig out of it)
  • the complete lack of chemistry for Leonard & Penny's relationship (with the exception of the scene noted above)
  • the overuse of the horny Amy Farah-Fowler jokes
  • how many times can a character(s) go away at the end of the season on some big science journey. You've gotta find a new way to end the season.
  • we're treading thin on the Sheldon's quirks jokes. They've been hilarious, true, but there's only so much carriage you can get of them, and we've got 6 seasons so far.
Overall rating? Above average for sitcoms, in general (which I usually find to be awful), but below average for The Big Bang Theory on whole. If you're a fan of the show, don't miss, but if you're not, don't start here. Start at the beginning.


Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Expiriments in Southeast Asian cuisine

A Food Journal

Acorn Squash & Pineapple Chicken Curry with Black Bean Pineapple Coconut Mint Rice

On Sunday nights, I usually try to make a big pot/pan of some dish to portion out and bring for lunch each day. This week, I decided to try something new: a quasi-Indian/tropical dish.

The rice:
I cooked the (brown) rice in coconut water, pineapple juice (unsweetened), and homemade chicken stock with black beans (canned, 'cuz it's easier, low sodium, washed and drained), pineapples, chopped fresh mint (from the Mikey Gee garden collection), a little garlic, and a habanero pepper.

Simple. Delicious. this would go with so many dishes.

The curry:

First, i sauteed a white onion and green bell pepper with EVOO, salt and pepper, until it was very soft. Then I mixed in the other ingredients: two habanero peppers (diced), minced garlic, chicken (pre-cooked and pulled apart), 1/2 acorn squash (pre-cooked), pineapple (canned, unsweeted, with juice), fresh mint (chopped, from the Mikey Gee garden collection), half & half, small part sour cream, chicken stock (homemade), and curry powder. All ingredients are eyeballed, so I have no idea how much. Mix thoroughly. Bring it all to a simmer, and then reduced to desired thickness.

Serve the curry over the rice with warm naan.

I was very happy with the result. Worth repeating, and tweaking in the future. Will add to future lunch rotations. Might try 86ing the squash and substituting mango or papaya. Maybe serve with some fried plantains on the side, if served for a dinner meal. Suppose you could go vegetarian, take out the chicken (replace with garbanzo beans?), and sub white wine (or boring vegetable stock) for the chicken stock.

Future cooking expiriments include (but are not limited to):
Madzoon Soup (Tutmaj) (that's yogurt soup to non-Armenians), from an authentic Armenian family recipe wonderfully shared with me by a certain violent pink Armenian bunny.

Southwest Lasagne (revisited), a recipe of my own design, lasagne--texas style: with chili for the sauce, cornbread for the noodles, sour cream for the ricotta cheese, and pepperjack for the mozzarella.

Pho

See you next time kids!

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Thirty Seconds to the End of the Set List

A Concert Review

Thirty Seconds to Mars 
San Jose State University Event Center, Oct. 11, 2013



A year-and-a-half, maybe two years ago I made a promise to myself. I said, "nate, you really like music, and you enjoy seeing bands you love play live, but you always balk whenever they come through for concerts, usually using ticket prices as an excuse. Yes, the ticket prices are high, but you can afford to go to the occasional show, and you will enjoy it. So, when a band you love comes through town, buy a ticket and go to the show!"

That philosophy has netted me exactly two concerts, Silversun Pickups and Thirty Seconds to Mars. I passed on Garbage (because I didn't notice the show until several weeks after tickets went on sale, and I didn't want to pay full price for way-ass-back seats since i've seen them three times already), Norah Jones (because $200 for the festival was a price I was not willing to pay), and Jack White. Kind of. I ended up seeing Jack White (and Regina Spektor!) because my wonderful and talented  cousin Lilly Mae got me in. I also got to see the Foo Fighters and Weezer (who are both excellent live bands) because my wonderful and talented friend Nick passed on tickets to me.

But this post is about Thirty Seconds to Mars' concert.

I've been a fan of TStM since the beginning. Literally. I saw their debut cd in a listening station at Warehouse Music years ago, right after it first came out. I gave it a listen, and since it was cheap, bought it on the spot. I liked it just fine. Heavy, electronic, sci-fi, right down my alley.

When their second album came out, i heard a song on the radio and was vastly under impressed. I didn't buy the album, and promptly forgot about them. Years later, my dear friends Matt & Haley insisted i check out this new RPG video game, Dragon Age: Origins. I did, and freakin loved the game. that's a review for another time, but when I beat the game, I sat down to pay respect to the creators by watching the credits. There was this song that played over the credits, and it was awesome. it fit the tone of the game, and I loved it. ANd listened to it like five or six times because the credits were ridiculously long and it was on repeat over them. So I did research, and found out it was the debut single for TStM new album "This Is War," which was not out and would not be out for several months.

I marked down the release date, and found myself at the store on that day to buy it.

The whole album was awesome. Epic, soaring, coherent, brimming with emotion, strength, tragedy. It lived in my headphones for a long time (also, one of the best album covers of all time: they collected thousands of headshot pictures of fans, and used each one for a cover. There were about 2,000 unique covers for the album). I picked up their fourth album when it was released, and liked it just fine. The songs were just as strong, but the full depth of emotion wasn't there.

I caught several live shows (on tv, recorded), including festival concerts and acoustic sets. They pulled off all of them excellently.

I was excited to see them when the tickets went on sale.

I showed up at the end of the set of the opening band, and I have no idea who it was. I was okay with that. The crowd was full of fresh-faced college kids (I mean, the show was on campus at SJSU). I expected to see more emo kids with purple hair and mohawks, and there were a few, but mostly it was yuppie white college kids. But they were all into the band.

The band is made up of three people: Jared Leto, singing and some guitars (dual hollywood star who appeared in the TV show My So-Called Life and movies, including Requiem for a Dream and American Psycho); Shannon Leto, drums; and Tomo Miličević, guitars. in the studio, they add a ridiculous amount of production, keyboards, sound effects, percussion, and bass (synth and guitar). More than the three of them can produce live.

Rather than fill out the live band and rearrange the music for live performance, they use backing tracks. this is hardly novel or unusual in the music biz; artists do it all the time these days. There's nothing wrong with that, in my opinion, but it does have it's limitations.

You have no flexibility in your arrangements or performances. Everything has to be played the same way every time. Most importantly, you can only perform songs that you've prepared and queued up for the show, and pretty much in your pre-ordained order.

This was the flaw of the show. They came out and did thirty minutes of songs. Jared Leto is phenomenal at interacting with the crowd and involving them in the show, and this crowd was an adoring and active participant. Then the other two disappeared back stage, while Jared remained with an acoustic guitar. he asked for requests, and the audience screamed out pretty much every song they hadn't played yet. he gave the appearance of listening to the crowd, but I suspect he had a couple very specific songs he planned to play or chose from. Why do I suspect this? Well, when the crowd banded together and started chanting collectively for "This Is War," he was forced to acquiesce. He tentatively played a little, and sang over it. He had to stop several times while he figured out what to play. he didn't even finish the first chorus before he abandoned the song completely, saying "I've never played that song acoustic in my life!" I don't knwo if that's true or not, but I was disappointed, doubly so. This Is War is probably my favorite by them, and him playing it (poorly) acoustically meant they weren't going to play the song with the full band.

After fiddling around on a few songs with the acoustic guitar, he called the rest of the band back out, and they rocked for another few songs. During their main set finale, they blasted two huge confetti cannons on the side of the stage, launching so much confetti into the air I couldn't believe it. With the fans and drafts they made, it just seemed to hover and sparkle in the air above us, slowly descending and blanketing the crowd. It was a rather spectacular effect; i was impressed.

And then they were done. The crowd hooted and hollered for a few more minutes, and they came back out. they gathered a bunch of people on stage (like i've seen them do often at televised concerts), did one more song, and then they were done.

time elapsed from beginning to end of show? Little bit less than an hour. Seriously? that's all I get? The set list was seriously lacking. They played all of their newest album, which they are touring in support of and I expected. They played a small selection of the popular songs from the third album, but hardly all of them. None from the first or second albums. One 45 second unreleased, untitled acoustic song that apparently is played in most of the shows.

Seriously, that was way too short. Shortest major live show I've ever seen. When I saw Weezer a few months back, they were only a little bit longer, but at least they played all of their major hits. When I've seen the Foo Fighters, you have to drag them off stage closing on 2 1/2 hours. their encore was almost as long as TStM whole set.

So, final verdict? Atmosphere, lighting, effects, and stage presence? Outstanding. Music? A really loud version of what I play in my car stereo; good songs, yes, but nothing new brought to the table. Set list? Disappointing; too short and missing several important songs.

Monday, October 14, 2013

The Particular Sadness of High Standards

A Book Review

The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake by Aimee Bender

I was late to this party. But seriously, the online book club I try to follow read this last spring. I didn't read it back then, I don't know why. I think i just never got around to it. Anyways, I saw it at Half Price books (one of my favorite places ever) and picked it up and sat it on my to-read shelf. You might think this would mean somethign promising, but, alas, there are at current thirty-four novels on my to-read shelf. In no particular order, so when i finish whatever I'm reading, I stand in front of it and pick something I feel like at that moment. It's also a "living document," i suppose they call it, because it grows every time I visit HPB.

I suppose none of this has much to do with Lemon Cake (to which I am a bit partial, being a fan of cake in general).

I was not a fan of this book. That is to say, I didn't dislike it. Ms. Bender is an excellent writer, and the atmosphere of the book is excellently surreal.

But the book suffered from a lack of identity. Was it a fairy tale? A mystery story? A coming-of-age tale? At times, it tried to be all of these and suffered by not doing any of them very well.

I guess I would liken it to a chick-lit version of Neil Gaiman. Good writing, good atmosphere, poor understanding of how to finish a story.

I also think a great deal of my disappointment comes from how I judge books. I have very high standards, and I expect a great deal from them, especially ones that win random literature awards and claim to be bestsellers. As a writer, I study plot and character and scene, and I hold you as a writer to my high expectations. If you're going to sacrifice story for scene, you better measure up (and my yardsticks for this type of story are One Hundred of Solitude, the early Jonathan Lethem novels pre-Motherless Brooklyn, and the Connie Willis novellas). And don't play that mystery game if you're gonna really do it.

So, if you're a casual reader who enjoys the magical and surreal, and doesn't mind a story filled with particular sadness (it's definitely not a happy read--in a good way), you will probably enjoy this one. it's a pretty fast and easy read.

With the poking and prodding of a good editor to direct and draw out the story completely, Ms. Bender has the wordsmith skills to make something really good.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Back on the horse?

I don't write enough. I want to change that. So let's try this again. I usually find it easiest to write regularly when I'm training for a race, I'm currently training for a half marathon (four miles ran today, slightly [ten seconds per mile) below desired race-pace) at Thanksgiving, so let's ride this pony while we still can!

A Book Review

It's All About the Bike (the Pursuit of Happiness on Two Wheels) by Robert Penn
(not to be confused with It's Not About the Bike by-ish Lance Armstrong, which I have not read)



I read a lot on my commutes, because I ride the train for about fifty minutes each way. But I have to get to the train station somehow, and so I ride my bike the three and a half miles to the station (and the three blocks from the station to work). I also like to read and ride away from my work-related travels, so why not combine all of it into one grand adventure?

My brother recommended this book to me after he read it, and fresh off the heels of my first century bike ride, I opened it up. This is the story of one man's journey to custom build his own perfect bicycle. As he journeys across Europe and America, through factories and into shops with bicycle artisans, Bell shares the history of the bicycle and each part, as well as the impact the bicycle has had on our culture and world.

A wonderful short-view on the history of the bicycle, and an ode to builders and manufacturers who strive for quality and longevity over economy and mass production.

It inspired me to want to rebuild my Raleigh, my commuter bike that I both loathe and love. I started by reading up on the internet and doing some minor tune-ups on my own (adjusting the brakes, deraileurs, and truing one of the wheels).

It's a quick read, easy as well, and you can sense the admiration Bell has for the bicycle. If we are truly in an age of cycling renaissance, as many have claimed, then this is a great tome for it's weekend warriors.

I'm not going to rate this book (or [m]any in this blog) because I've discovered that my rating scales are much more harsh than the average person, and I'm a peculiar fellow who likes peculiar things (*cough* Cleopatra 2525 *cough*). But if you're the sort who likes bicycles enough to want to tinker around with them, even a little bit, and you like history just fine, read this book.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Road Race Report: "It's supposed to hurt like hell!"



The three most difficult (endurance) athletic events of my life (in chronological order):

My first half marathon, Feb of 2011

13.1 miles, half of them complete suckage, 5.1 further than I’d ever run before. I pushed my body to the very limits of what it was capable of doing (at that time). I crossed the finish line, nearly collapsed, and swore I’d never do it again (I’ve since run 4 more, with another on the docket)

Day 1 backpacking 8 miles in the Yosemite back country, June 2013

We thought the route was 6 miles; it was actually 8. We expected a nice, warm day; we got a sweltering 105 degree heat wave. We thought we had enough water; we were wrong.  I thought (all) I would have to carry was 60 pounds of gear; occasionally I shouldered my companions’ wonderful 1 ½ year old daughter. Add on top of that the mile-high-plus altitude, and half of our group never having backpacked before, and you’ve got a recipe for a long, long day. It was also followed by day 2 & day 3, which were similar but not as difficult because I was mentally prepared for the circumstances. I learned a valuable lesson in endurance that day*


I was invited by my close friend Jesse to join his company’s (Mazzetti) cycling team for this 100 mile bicycle ride. I was thrilled; I’d never done an organized bicycle ride despite riding regularly for a year and a half, and my only attempt at riding 100 miles in one day had been thwarted at mile 75 by mechanical failure on my bike.

I already rode regularly (40+ mile weekend rides were common), but I only had a month or so for official training. That meant a slew of nights on the indoor trainer working on pedaling form, a 60 mile ride with Jesse (which sucked), a 40 mile ride with a 2,000 foot climb for hill training (which sucked), and a group of 45ish mile rides at various levels of success. I was ready, I suppose, but I wish I’d had another month of dedicated training.

I also skipped one 45 mile training ride near the end of the month. Why, you ask? To buy a new bicycle, of course! It was a beneficial exchange. I traded my Raleigh Revenio 1.0 (a bike I’ve had nothing but trouble with) for a Giant Defy Composite 1.0, a significant upgrade in bicycle quality. I’ll save the comparisons between bikes for another post, though.

Because the race started at 7am in Napa, I chose to stay the night before at a motel in Santa Rosa and drive 30 minutes to get to the race rather than 2 hours. I met Jesse and his family at a friend’s house (thanks Edgar for dinner!) for a wonderful wonderful pasta dinner, and retired to my room. I laid out all my gear, prepped up my bike, drank some grapefruit juice (my pre-race tradition), and watched bad tv until I fell asleep.

I woke up on time (5am is too early in the morning for anything!), loaded my stuff, picked up Jesse, and made our way to the starting line. We ate a little breakfast (bagels with cream cheese, fruit, granola bars), drank a little coffee (not enough, in my opinion), and met up with our teammates Walt, Laura, and Neil. I was very excited to don the team jersey they had made for us.


The sun finally peaked over the horizon at about 7am, and we crossed the start line together at 7:30am. The morning sunlight was soft over the hills and valleys, the highlights almost supernatural, and the air brisk. Brisk when you’re standing still, but freezing cold when you’re riding down the street at 18 miles per hour. Which is to say that it was frakin’ COLD when we first started out. It wasn’t until about mile 20 that my arms and legs thawed out, and around mile 30 that my toes finally began to feel anything except cold.

The scenery and camaraderie made it easy to forget. As we formed our first pace line (a rotating single-file line of bicycles riding very close together to break the wind for each other much the same as geese flying in a v-pattern), we looked out over the vineyards of gorgeous Napa Valley (the most famous wine region outside of France) and saw dozens of hot-air balloons lifting off of the ground and rising into the air. They seemed so close we could nearly touch them, and Laura especially was astonished by them.

We talked as we rode, and I was excited to discover that Walt, our team leader grew up in the Kansas City suburbs, just like me, and graduated from my rival high school (SM South will always be better than SM East!) We traded stories about KC and high school, and wondered at the beauty of the morning.

We stopped at the first rest stop around mile 20, because all of us had to pee. I adjusted my seat up a centimeter or so because my knee was starting to bother me (fixed the problem). We adjusted Neil’s seat down, because it was way too high. Grabbed a peanut butter and bread square and an orange wedge, and set out on Stage 2.

I felt strong. I was finally warm.

Stage 2 had some hills, but they weren’t too high, and mostly rolling. Couple hundred feet of climbing, but gradual with stretches of flats and slight downhills. It was also the shortest “stage” of the ride, only about 12 miles. We stopped at the rest stop, and I munched on some of my brought foodstuffs (Aussie Bites from Costco), and set out on Stage 3.

I felt strong. Other riders at rest stop 2 were dreading the upcoming climb, but I knew I’d done a much more difficult climb (the Sierra grade) a few weeks earlier. I was curious to see how my new bike would handle the mountain, but not worried about the climb. Too much.

We took off on stage 3, and before too long we turned into the hill. The serious climb of the course, the hardest individual section, was a 1000ish foot vertical climb over 4 miles. I was ready for it. We immediately broke into two sections, with Jesse, Laura, and I in the first and Walt sticking with Neil in the second. Jesse took the clear lead, and broke into the front. I rode with Laura for awhile, and then she stuck with a couple of other women we passed as I forged ahead. The hill was a steady grind, but I never felt stressed. I met Jesse and a couple of other riders at the top, and waited for everyone else to catch up. I ate a little from my grab-bag (a Honey StingerEnergy Waffle), though I should have had more. I still felt strong, at the moment, but the hill (and 45 miles of cycling) had consumed energy and I still had more than 55 miles to go.

After a bit, Jesse, Laura, and I ventured back down the hill (the wrong way!) to meet up with Walt and Neil and pull them up to the top. Neil hadn’t been able to train as much as he would have liked, and the hill was not an easy climb.

We reached the top, and decided to ride the fun part (the descent) before pow-wowing and making any decisions.

It was fun. Eight miles of steady downhill, although for the first time on the ride we were on a major road with significant traffic (which would be par for the rest of the course).  I clocked a top speed at one point of 42.2 miles per hour (tying a personal best), and I could’ve easily gone faster except for the three “fifteen MPH turns,” or so I dubbed them (because of the road signs advising to take the turns at a speed of 15 mph).

We pow-wowed at the bottom of the descent, because Neil was gassed. The climb had taken everything he had. We decided to pace-line a slow pace the five or so miles until the next rest stop, where Neil could turn back or turn in, if he so chose. Because I had the only cyclo-computer (and thus could tell exactly how fast we were going), I was chosen to “pull” (lead the pace-line) at a steady pace to the next rest stop.

We stopped at rest stop 3 (which was actually rest stop 4 for the return trip for this section of the loop). Jesse’s wife Melissa met us at the rest stop, and picked up Neil who decided to bow out at that time. He’d done a great ride, but he was spent. It was a great pleasure riding with him.

I filled my water bottles (for the first time). I probably hadn’t drank as much as I should have, but I started the race well-hydrated and wasn’t off bad at all. But I made my first real mistake here. I didn’t eat anything.

I felt strong. The first 35 miles of the ride were the best I’d ever ridden. I felt like I hadn’t even burned an ounce of energy, and I powered up the hill like a boss. We were halfway done, and I felt stronger than ever, even after 50 miles. I might have felt a little over –confident, I won’t lie.

We left rest stop 3(/4), a little over half-way through the ride, knowing that all the major climbs were behind us. We got into our paceline, and got going. We skipped the actual rest stop 3 a few miles later (since it was only a few miles past our cheater rest stop 4), and got about the business of closing out the ride.

We rode north-ish through beautiful towns and roads in the Napa Valley, and made our turnaround through fields of vineyards and the wonderful early afternoon sun. We picked up two other riders about this point in our paceline, and we turned into a headwind for the first time all day.

I remember pulling (being first in the paceline, breaking the wind for everyone else behind), and Walt calling out to me, “You’ve got a big responsibility, Nate, we’ve got a full train here!” By this point, I believe we’d picked up four other riders, and our full group was eight riders strong.

I passed off the lead, and dropped back into the group.

At 60 miles, I didn’t feel strong any more. I still felt fine, but it had been 20 miles since I’d eaten anything, and my stomach was starting to be a little uneasy. I hit the first mini-wall. As part of the pace-line, I powered through it until we (re)stopped at rest area 4 (the same one as before, this time when we were supposed to stop). I kept staring at the number-bib on Walt’s jersey in front of me. At the top it said, “Ride to Defeat ALS,” and then our individual race number, and then the slogan “Never Give Up!” I used that for inspiration.




I tried to eat a Honey Stinger Energy Waffle, but my stomach was too upset and I threw half of it away.

At mile 70, I said to myself, “Alright, Nate, it’s mile 70. You’re a little more than 2/3rds of the way finished. This is just like mile 10 of a half marathon, you know what this feels like. You can do this.” It inspired me for about 10 seconds, when I realized, “At mile 10 of a half marathon run, you have 25-30 minutes of work left and then you’re done. I’ve still got nearly two hours of riding left! That’s like running the entire half marathon.” Thankfully, I took this thought with a humorous attitude rather than a defeatist.

At mile 78, I was gassed. I was keeping up with the pace line, barely, but my thigh muscles were twitching and threatening to cramp. My stomach was not happy, and I couldn’t even stomach the Accelerade I had in one of my water bottles. The only thing that I could handle was the other water bottle, which had been treated with a Camel Bak Elixer tablet. This was somewhat of a problem, since my battleplan for the race had included half of my caloric consumption to come from the Accelerade. I’d already fallen away on the other half when I stopped eating, and now my energy level was dangerously low.

My thigh muscles, specifically in my right leg, were starting to twitch and threaten to cramp. I was worried; I feared I might have to stop to get off and stretch them, but I didn’t want to stop the paceline. Part of it was machismo, part of it was embarrassment; until  mile 70 or so, I’d been one of the strong riders, now I had slipped down to one of the weaker ones.

And then Laura got a flat tire. It was the first (and only) our team had dealt with for the ride. I’d been paranoid about flats, since the Raleigh that I’d been riding on previously was notoriously unreliable, but we’d had great luck. I considered this flat lucky. We had to stop to fix it, but we had the tools and it gave me time to stretch my legs and gather my energy. And the final rest stop was only a few more miles away, and I could rest there.

After fixing the flat, we made it to the final rest stop at mile 83. I remember this stop vividly. I knew I needed energy, and for energy I needed to eat something, but my stomach revolted at the idea. I filled up my empty bottle with cold water, and looked at the spread of food. In the most unusual craving of my life, I noticed a canister of Red Vine black licorice. I got so excited, and said, “is that licorice?!” the woman behind the table said, “Yes, but it’s black.” She sounded disappointed, like people who don’t appreciate the wonder of black licorice. I do, and immediately grabbed a vine. “this is the weirdest craving ever, but this is exactly what I want,” I said as I nibbled, and she realized that I was happy about the black licorice instead of confused. “Unusual, isn’t it?” she said.

They also had potatoes, which had been cooked with rosemary (which they had at all the stops), and I really wanted some (with salt, because you need a lot of salt at that point), but my stomach didn’t agree with me. I settled for an orange wedge, and stuffed a few licorice vines into my pack. I didn’t end up eating them. I wish they’d had an ice cold can of Coke at that stop. Would’ve changed my life.

* As we waited at the rest stop, Jesse asked me how I was doing. “I’m doing fine,” I told him, “just worn out. But I learned a lesson when we were backpacking Yosemite last June. That first day, when we were close to camp but not quite there, I thought I was at the end of my rope, I would have nothing left. But when we reached camp before everyone, I set down my backpack and knew I had to double-back to help them on that home stretch. I started back down the trail, and I felt good, and I started going faster, and then jogging a little bit even. I realized at that moment that you always have more energy than you think you do. There is always more than you can dig deep and find.”
I was talking with my sister about this exact same thing after the ride. So much of endurance athletics is a mental exercise. Your body can do so much more, go so much further than you think it can. You just have to be in that right place. Dean Karnazes, a remarkable ultramarathon runner, quoted something his father told him before a race: “Run if you can, walk if you have to, and crawl if you must, just never give up.” He may not have known it, but he was actually paraphrasing Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who said “If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

I didn’t want to wait long before getting started again, because I feared my body would think we were done and start shutting down, so I half-heartedly lobbied to get on the road quickly. We did not, and I’m glad we did not. I needed the rest, and it did me good.

I made my second mistake at this rest stop, though it was more of an error of omission than a mistake. A pretty girl riding alone a Specialized Roubaix with a camel bak backpack stopped, and I talked with her briefly. We mostly discussed the headwinds. I thought about inviting her to ride with us in our pace line, but I chickened out by rationalizing that she might be riding the 63 and not the Century and that we would be leaving soon and she just arrived at the rest stop so she might want to stay longer. I said, I’ll look for her at the finish, and maybe talk to her then. It didn’t happen. A microcosm of my interactions with the opposite sex throughout my entire life. Let’s face it: I suck at talking to girls.
A promotional shot; not the actual pretty girl
We finally left, after resting longer than I wanted to, but I’m glad that we stayed as long as we did. We had 20ish more miles to go, which simultaneously felt like absolutely nothing and forever at the exact same time. Jesse took the lead, and we settled into a pace line. Before too long, we picked up another solo rider, who was grateful for the chance to draft off of us, even if that meant sharing time at the front. It proved to me the brotherhood of cycling; there is absolutely zero to be gained riding alone, and nothing but benefits from riding in a group. This fellow, Aaron (or Erin), spoke no more than 2 sentences with me, but I felt a kinship with him after riding 15ish miles together.

Leaving that final rest stop, we settled into a perfect pace line. I was weak, but the rests at the stop and with the flat had given me time to recoup a little bit. I didn’t have the strength to pull the group, but I could keep up as we kept going south-ish. We were all of one mind, riding within inches of each other’s tires at a unified pace, Jesse, Walt, and Aaron doing most of the pulling. We reached the southmost point of the course, and turned north. The wind was no longer blowing into our face. 

Jesse was in the lead of the pace line, and with a tail wind, he cranked up the pace. After 95 miles, I hadn’t the energy to keep up. I drifted to the back, and fell behind. I didn’t begrudge them anything, and would have been fine if they went on without me. I knew I could finish, but I would be satisfied with finishing, period, regardless of whether or not I did it with the team.

They didn’t let me fall too far behind.

It was so wonderful to be a part of a team, to have spent that whole time side-by-side (figuratively), striving together for something so intangible. I can’t say enough how much better the experience was because I was with them. Their excitement, encouragement, friendliness made us all stronger and better for it. Riding with Walt, Laura, Neil, and Jesse really did make a wonderful experience spectacular, and I have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for all four of them.

We finally made the turn into the Veteran’s Center, the final ¼ mile until the finish. Jesse had fallen back with me, and the rest of them were only a little in front of me. I was gassed. Each pedal stroke was more than I thought I could do, and the muscles in my thighs were twitching with each revolution. I had to stand up on the pedals and stretch them every few times around so they didn’t lock up. 

It felt like electric currents were being jolted through my thighs. My knees hurt. My stomach roiled. My face felt windblasted. My feet felt constricted. There was a knot in my left lower back. My brain was scrambled.

The finish was so close.

At around 200 yards to the finish, less than one minute of riding, my stomach finally revolted. It would let me go no further, and I had to pull off to the side of the road to throw up. I dry heaved a few times, and Jesse circled back. He held my bike while I sat down for a second. I lay down, and moaned for a few minutes while I gathered myself.

I was so mad at myself, so close to the finish. If I could have held out for literally one more minute, I would have been across the finish and it would be over. But no, my body had given out here, just short. The thought of getting back on that seat was not a pleasant one. I contemplated walking my bike across the finish, but quickly decided that I’d ridden 99.9 miles and I would cross the finish on my saddle.

I climbed on, clipped my pedals in, lowered into the lower gears, and pedaled across the finish.


If you’ve never done it, crossed the finish line after something like that, I can’t properly explain to you what it feels like (and that’s one reason I suggest everyone do something like that, at least once in your life). There’s a sense of relief, accomplishment, pride, exhaustion, satisfaction, and ridiculousness; you’ll really just have to do it yourself.

Dean Karnazes tells the story in his memoir “UltramarathonMan” of his first cross-country race (and victory).  He recalls the conversation with his coach at the finish line like this,
“’Good work, son,’ he said. ‘How’d it feel?’
“’Well,’ I answered slowly, ‘…It felt pretty good.’
“Coach kicked some dirt around with his foot. ‘If it felt good,’ he said, squinting like Clint Eastwood, ‘you didn’t push hard enough. It’s supposed to hurt like hell.’”

No matter how much pain, misery, or exhaustion you feel, you will never regret crossing that finish line if you put everything you had into it and pushed yourself across that finish line with as little left in the tank as possible.

And, believe it or not, you will forget the pain, and the next day, maybe two or three later, but sooner than you’d think, you will wake up wondering when your next ride will be.